Matt Hancock MP Launches App To Bemusement Of General Public

Matt Hancock – some people know him, some people don’t – he’s the current Digital, Culture, Media & Sport secretary of the United Kingdom and forms part of Her Majesty’s Government.

His department is the former Culture, Media & Sport department and in an effort to show that he considers ‘Digital’ an important part of his role, he’s embraced the world of digital and employed a development agency to make an app.  A phone app.  An app you can use on your tablets.  An app all about…

Matt Hancock

Introducing the new ‘Matt Hancock’ app!  To quote an early adopter, Robert Hutton, “it’s like having an actual Matt Hancock in the palm of your hand!”.

Stills are from the intro video that you are greeted with after first launching the Matt Hancock app.  The purported aim of the app is to engage with his local constituents in West Suffolk but, needless to say, in a matter of days, Matt Hancock has gone global.  OK, global *may* be a slight exaggeration but he’s certainly gone national.  Absolutely further than West Suffolk.

Although no, I’ve not personally joined the Matt Hancock revolution yet.

What’s It All About?

Well, leaving connecting with constituents to one side, it’s social media, kind of Facebook-esque (old world, not current!) and people can be social with each other.

But… rather than having Mark Zuckerberg to idolise like a god you have Matt Hancock.  Matt Hancock has put himself all over the app.  You can check in on what Matt Hancock is currently doing.  Look at what he’s having for tea.  Have a look at the latest selfie he’s taken.

But, it’s not a vanity project… honest!

Who Are The People Using It?

Good question – at the moment, journalists have jumped all over.  Also, Matt Hancock seems to have a lot of ‘fans’ that have also joined up.  Also, following his new found fame with the launch of the eponymous app, a whole cross section of society appear to have signed up.  International take up appears low at this time, but it’s early days.

Whilst users of the worlds biggest social networking site Facebook are sometimes unofficially known as ‘Facebookers’ or ‘Zuckers’, following on in a similar fashion, users of Matt Hancock are affectionately (yet unofficially, as far as we know) known as ‘Mancocks’ or just ‘cocks’ for short (hence the 17+ app rating).

What’s Not To Like?

Well, not much I guess.

The department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, which oversees the Information Commissioners Office, stresses the importance of app developers following it’s official guidance for privacy in mobile apps.

Seems developers Disciple Media may not have got the memo though.

Given the recent debacle surrounding allegedly “handsy” MP’s, Matt Hancock sure wants to get his hands on your data:

But, at least he asks.

Will Matt Hancock overtake Facebook?  Only time can tell.

For now, we’ll leave you with Matt Hancock singing ‘Don’t Stop Me Now’ in the style of Queen – enjoy!

E-mail is dying, while social networking and media is increasing as a communication tool

Do you use e-mail for communication between friends and family anymore? The likely answer is no, even though e-mail was once a very popular communication method that people used every day to communicate with friends and family online

Instant messaging came along.

Instant messaging has been around for a very long time. It was likely popularised by AOL’s messenger service, AIM. AIM has been around for a very long time – since 1997 and was used more in the early 2000s than now. AIM still has a good market share in the United States today, but in Europe, Windows Live Messenger has, by far, the largest market share of them all.

Instant messaging is fast.

Unlike e-mailing, instant messaging is both and instant. It’s a great way to communicate with friends because it is instant. Some folks may not even use Windows Live Messenger anymore. But it’s not because instant messaging is going away any time soon, it is rather because people use Facebook for messaging. But I don’t agree that Windows Live Messenger is going to die anytime soon, because I think for the users who use the Internet a lot during the day still use Windows Live Messenger or another instant messaging network, such as Skype, Google talk or XMPP. Never heard of XMPP? XMPP is an open-standards communications protocol – it’s the opposite of Microsoft’s Windows Live Messaging protocol which is proprietary and therefore not open-standards.

If anything, more people are using Skype for communication – so it’s a good thing for Microsoft now they have acquired Skype (and Microsoft are very serious about Skype – they have an entire Skype Division at Microsoft’s campus).

Social networking.

Yes, there has been a sharp rise in social networking, and it is proof to everyone that anything can become wildly successful if you have the right product or service, and Facebook is one of them. Why has Facebook become phenomenally successful? Because it is all about socialising and communication. These are things people have always done – in person, texting, what have you – so I am not surprised how much revenue Facebook is now making because their service has become incredibly successful in just the space of five years or so.

So, is e-mailing dead?

Everyone has different opinions on this and this is just my opinion. I don’t believe e-mail is dead (and there are interesting services such as Shortmail.com), but I do think the use of e-mail is simply changing to more long-term e-mail communication. For example, we all still use e-mails to get updates on orders we’ve placed for online shopping we do, or e-mail updates or newsletters from online companies, reminders of service invoices and e-mailing someone we know when they’re not online on instant messaging and so forth.

Icons used
The icons used in this article are either open source or are released by their respective authors under a license that permits their use in a commercial or non-commercial environment where attribution is not required.

Article author
This article was brought to you by Ben Stones, a partner of DPS Computing Limited producing regular articles for DPS Computing. I believe in providing the very best professional, unbiased and high-quality editorial content you expect as a reader of DPS Computing. I’d like to thank David for providing me the opportunity to write articles for DPS Computing. You are welcome to send your suggestions and feedback regarding my articles by e-mailing me.  Original

Original Publication – September 2012.

Why Your Children Should Not Have Facebook Until At Least Age 21

Social Media Keyboard

Social media is something that only the most recent generation have had to grow up with.  Debuting on the Internet scene in the early noughties, social networking sites have flourished and presented a land of opportunities.  However, it has equally presented an extremely dangerous system into each and everybody’s homes.

While many misguidedly feel that letting their children have a Facebook account (or similar social networking account) is just harmless fun, many parents only realise the profound negative impact it can have on their childrens when it is tragically, far too late.

As a parent, you’ve probably heard a similar warning time and time again – and I’d hazard to guess that approximately 80%, if not more, have dismissed as scaremongering or something that they don’t need to consider for their family.

The following point cannot be made forcefully enough, so if there is one thing that you take heed of today, ensure it is this:

Social Networking Can Kill Or Seriously Harm Your Child.

Now, before you brush this off as over zealous, anti social network, hyperbole lets take a look at the brutal facts of the matter.

Not only does social networking on the Internet have the potential to kill or seriously harm your child there are many documented and validated cases of where this has already happened.

Shocked to find this out?  Most of you probably will be – but the unfortunate truth of the matter is that social networking is more dangerous to your child than the risk of drugs, alcohol or smoking.

Again, there are two fundamental reasons why social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter are a more apparent danger to your children than the misuse of substances:

  • Parents widely accept their childs usage of social networks.
    Yes, while the vast majority of families would hit the roof and do all they can to prevent the use (or misuse) or drugs, alcohol and cigarettes, most parents (unwittingly) allow a major cause of death and (physical and/or mental) injury into their homes with open arms.  
  • Parents are naive to the imminent danger social networks put their child in
    Whether parents know it or not, from the second their child logs into a social network until the second their child logs out of a social network, they are playing Russian Roulette with their safety.

I can see some digital eyes rolling at this moment in time, so lets take a look at some cases.

How far back do we have to look to find social networking to have been a part of a teenagers death?  Not far at all.  3 days to be precise.

Nichole Cable (15) – May 2013

Look familiar?  Why shouldn’t it.  Nichole Cable is a typical teenager with the rest of her life ahead of her.

That was until May 2013, when last month an older male (known to Nichole, an ex boyfriend) killed her after what was thought to be a failed kidnapping attempt by the 20 year old ex come stalker.

The MO of the perpetrator is one that is becoming all too familiar.  Wanting to reconcile with Nichole, and with delusional thinking in tow, he believe that kidnapping his ex would rekindle their love affair.

It should be noted that the parents of Nichole forbade the relationship to continue prior to the murder after he was involved with a high speed police pursuit (a real winner, evidently).

The parents made the right choice and took steps to protect their child.  Or so they thought.

Dube, the ex friend come stalker, took to Facebook and set up a fake profile to lure Nichole out to meet him at the end of her street – unbeknownst the extreme danger that her life was going to be put in.

Nichole was cautious, cautious enough to initially turn down requests to meet “Bryan Butterfield” (please note, many teenagers will not be this cautious).  However, in the end she agreed, and unfortunately, this was one of the last decisions she made.

Protecting your child from murders is reason enough to ban them from Facebook.  But even if the ultimate price is paid due to their social networking usage, many other terrible tragedies can occur.

Many in society are currently campaigning for the “naming and shaming” of pedophiles, or child sex offenders.  Forget this crusade (at least for the moment), there is a far more imminent and devastating threat on your doorstep.

Facebook users are usually young in general, the biggest group undoubtedly being the (under) 18 to 25 group.

Unfettered, discreet access to children via social networks means that it is all too often inhabited by many people we wouldn’t like our children to know of, let alone interact with.

Sometimes, it can be us as parents that unwittingly set of a chain reaction of events.

April Jones (5) – September 2012

April Jones was a five year old from Wales.

The case has been well publicised in the UK and earlier this week Mark Bridger was found guilty of her murder.

During the trial it was exposed the Bridgers laptop was not only full of child pornography, featuring under age girls but that he had taken a unhealthy interest in April and her sister, downloading their pictures from Facebook, nine days before her tragic death.

Now, the murder of this innocent young girl may have taken place anyway – no one can say for sure – but the access to pictures of your children through social networking sites can mean that they insert your children into their sick fantasies and develop and unhealthy, and potential deadly, interest in your child.

I don’t think there is one parent that would, in the real world, hand over pictures of their primary school children to a pedophile.  Yet, by placing pictures of your children and distributing them on a worldwide network you are potentially doing this not just once, but millions of times.

It is well known, by people in the IT and legal professions, that pedophiles and child sex offenders use the Internet to gather, distribute, share and trade pictures of children that they find online – including, with an alarmingly increasing rate, pictures found on social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

Murder and pedophilia are of course enough to make most parents want to deactivate their childrens Facebook immidately, possibly to even consider removing all instances of computing technology from their house completely.

Not only does social media provide a danger from outsiders, but it also, disproportionately among young people, can be used to make your child hurt themselves.

Carolina Picchio (14) – May 2013

Unfortunately, we don’t have to look far back to find the latest social networking related child suicide either.  The same three days in fact that we had to look back for a social networking related child murder.

Again, another day, another country, another typical teenager.

Along with the use of mobile phones, social networking websites (Facebook, in this case) was used to undertake a campaign of cyberbullying against a teenage girl in Italy.

After splitting up with her boyfriend, his friends thought it would be good to use an upsetting video shot at a recent party, where Carolina was looking a bit worse for wear, to bully her.  This video was then widely circulated by said ex boyfriend and friends.

Along with a campaign of upsetting, abusive and disturbing messages, this all-to-familiar action of this teens social group ended up leading to hear leaping out of her families fourth storey apartment window to her death.

On the day of her death she received at least 2,600 vulgar messages via social media.

The sheer power of the danger of social networking is not just limited to children as well – it is catching more and more adults out.

Melissa Huggins-Jones – May 2013

Melissa Huggins-Jones went through a divorce to escape her partner.

She moved states to get away from her ex, but unfortunately, although this may have been enough in the 90’s to escape from an ex who won’t take no for an answer, sadly today it is not.

We can move our homes to move ourselves out of harms way, but in the Internet age this can be a faux sense of security that can lead to our downfall.

While we may move homes, we don’t usually at the same time move Facebook profiles.  In fact, even if we did delete and recreate a new profile, it’s probably not that hard to track down the new profile using a small amount of time and a cursory Facebook search – anyone who knows any piece of personal information about you can use it to track you down on the information superhighway.

Her ex-husband wouldn’t have had any where near as much chance of tracking her down in the pre-Internet days.  But as social networks continue to integrate more easily and readily into our daily lives than ever before, their use as a tool to stalk and track someone down have never been more real.

Fearing that her ex-husband was indeed actively using Facebook to track her movements she deleted her page completely three days before her death.

Unfortunately, by this time the damage was already done.  Enough information was already revealed to an evidently violent ex.

To sum up….

I imagine most of you reading this article will have been extremely skeptical about the headline of this article.  Hopefully now, I have managed to make it clear how social networking can, has been and will continue to be a major harmer of our children – it is rapidly becoming the primary  one.

Even if your family is lucky enough that your child doesn’t become a victim of social media, they may indeed become the instigator of a criminal offence (unwittingly) through their use of social media.

In the case of Carolina Picchio the Italian legal system is not only considering taking action against the social network in question – but against the ‘teens’ involved in the cyber bullying – looking into charges of ‘Instigating sucide’ and ‘distributing pedopornography’ – both extremely serious crimes (as if you need me to tell you).

The only way to protect your child from the imminent danger that they are in on social networks is to forbid them to use them until they are at least in adulthood – and probably by which time they will be better equipped to deal with the dangers lurking round every corner.

Personally, I’d recommend the age of 21.  Although parents may struggle to carry on the influence of their rules beyond the teenage years.

Please, please, please take one message from this article, if nothing else:

Social Networking – Don’t Die Of Ignorance

New Youth Police & Crime Commissioner In Twitter Row

The new Youth Police & Crime Commissioner Paris Brown, who only started the job a matter of days ago has been blasted for tweets posted on her old personal Twitter account which appeared to show underlying racist, homophobic and abusive views while condoning drug usage and detailing her sex life.

The Mail decided to run with an article detailing tweets sent by Paris Brown on an account which she has now deleted.

Some of her tweets included complementing a fellow Twitter user on their top which was covered in cannabis leaves while another stated her love for the prescription pills that she was on at the time.

In another tweet she stated that she was either “fun, friendly and inclusive” but more likely to be “antisocial, racist, sexist, embarrasing ******”.  She also detailed tweets of how she was going to get “oh so unattractively drunk” at the weekend, despite her being in her early teens at the time.

On the issue of sex, she commented that she wondered whether it was “owls” that she could here or whether her neighbours “just didn’t know how to **** quietly”.  In addition, she claimed that the worst part of coming home from a party single was that she was “horny as ****” and had to sleep alone.

On the topic of violence and bullying she tweeted that she didn’t condone violence but that she’s “so pleased that my brother punched the fat little **** …. that gave him a black eye”.

In a number of other tweets she appeared to make blatantly racist remarks regarding people who dont speak English and homophobic remarks referring to people as “faggots”.

Despite calls for Miss Brown to resign she has the support of Kent Police and Crime Commissioner Ann Barnes and has so far remained in her post.  She has taken to Twitter on her new @YouthPCC account and apologised as well as issuing a statement of apology through the media.

On social networking site opinion appears to be divided over whether Miss Brown should remain in her role or step down – many stating that they do not believe she deserves the £15,000 per year tax payer funded role.

Conversely, it has been pointed out that most of the offensive tweets are not recent and can be attributed to a phase that the teenager went through in her younger years and that her response to the scandal has shown her maturity.

Once again, this issue has brought to the forefront the need for restraint when using social media and the importance of correct usage of privacy settings as well as remembering that everything that you say online is in a public forum and could come back to haunt you, even years later.

Of course, everyone makes mistakes and “grows out of” tweets and statuses they have set in the past, however, while they still remain on a public social networking profile they can and will still be attributed to you.

Today, the Youth Police & Crime Commisioner spoke to the media regarding the tweets:

What is your opinion?  Are the tweets a sign of underlying racist, homophobic and unacceptable views or was it just a teenager being a teenager?  Should she step down from her job or does it make us realise that she’s only human like the rest of us?  Is sorry enough and will she be able to move on from this and make a success of her new role?

Controversy Causing Web Celebs – Smart or Stupid?

Question Mark - Puzzle

There’s a new breed of celebrity that is becoming ever more popular in the 2010’s – and that’s the web celebrity.  Some become famous due to a definable talent or skill – but increasingly, many new ‘web celebs’ simply become famous for being famous – by means of causing controversy.

The two latest controversy causing teenagers on the scene are Reece Messer (Rileyy_69), who was recently suspended from social networking website Twitter, and Olly Riley, Rileyy_69’s arch nemesis.

So, why are they entering the realms of web celebrity status?  Well, basically, for being grossly offensive (in a lot of peoples opinions) to pretty much random people on the Internet.  Oh and in Olly’s case, asking for girl sock shots (if you don’t know what we’re on about, consult the ever growing list of tweets on the subject).

Obviously, the Internet is an excellent tool – and has allowed people to become famous in real life, based on real talent – for example, Lily Allen was discovered through her social networking profiles (mainly MySpace and YouTube) to which she had posted numerous videos.  Most people, no doubt, support this kind of web fame.

However, as in real life, there is only a select group who really appreciate, understand, respect or admire the ‘famous for being famous’ celebrities – mentioning no names!  ;).

Is causing controversy by being overtly vulgar and/or sexual something which society tolerates or actively encourages?  Both Messer and Riley gained tens (possibly over a hundred) thousand extra followers as a result of their public bickering and abuse.  Not only that, they, especially Messer, started gaining quite a bit of media attention, which started from the time when Messer abused Olympic and Team GB diving star, Tom Daley.

Twitter logoSo, why do these people manage to gain so many extra followers on Twitter?  Do we like them or are we simply amused and intrigued by their behaviour?

In what is now set to be an ever increasing trend, is society encouraging a new emerging group of teenagers who cause online mischief for the sake of gaining some sort of public recognition?  Do the people behind the profiles actually hold the, sometimes shocking, views that the express online or are they just clamouring the attention their statements will bring?

Maybe it’s for financial gain?  Or maybe that’s just of secondary importance?  Olly Riley recently released his own clothing range online and is believed to now be represented by an agent.  The success or otherwise of Riley’s new ventures has yet to be determined and DPS Computing can find no credible information regarding the sales figures for the online shop.

One things for sure at the moment – no matter what happens in the future, this web celeb trend is set to continue for a while yet.